How Jatiya Party is next target after fall of Awami League – Firstpost

In recent days, leaders of the anti-discrimination movement have launched verbal attacks against the Jatiya Party, accusing it of colluding with the Awami League. Notably, the Jatiya Party was not invited to talks facilitated by the chief counsel’s office, which included all other political parties except the Awami League and its allies. In Rangpur, a Jatiya Party stronghold, those student leaders were declared unsuitable by the party. Later, a student leader, Sarjis Alam, visited the city accompanied by the Bangladesh Inspector General of Police.

On 31 October in Dhaka, student leaders announced plans for an attack on the central office of the Jatiya Party, which resulted in vandalism and arson, indicating a coordinated attack. This raises concerns about the orchestration of previous incidents of violence, which have previously been characterized as mob action.

A student leader admitted in a television program that the fires in subway stations and the killing of police officers were part of their strategy. Councilor Nahid Islam stated that if their so-called “revolution” faltered, they had intentions to initiate an armed movement, even preparing a video message with a journalist for this purpose. This further emphasizes that this movement was not a spontaneous uprising; Muhammad Yunus described it as a “meticulously designed” initiative.

Various tactics were used to engage segments of the public as part of their plans A, B and C, which apparently included arson and weapon theft. This raises critical questions about the origins and whereabouts of weapons intended for their planned armed uprising, and whether there was a coordinated effort to aid in the prison break and facilitate the escape of the militants. What previous arrangements have been made with top criminals and can Gen-Z get involved in these issues?

In Mirpur, garment workers attempted to loot a police food truck due to prolonged unemployment resulting from the closure of over a hundred factories. This desperation led to clashes between the workers and the security forces, culminating in the army opening fire, resulting in the death of two workers. In retaliation, the workers set fire to army and police vehicles. In the midst of this turmoil, a surprise attack on the central office of the Jatiya Party was orchestrated, apparently to divert attention from the unrest. It was claimed that Jatiya Party workers had instigated the violence, even presenting a plastic gun as evidence – an article that broke under the scrutiny of a journalist, highlighting the absurdity of the situation.

Additionally, Yunus’ recent interview with The Financial Express has ignited debate and criticism among journalists, with many questioning his undemocratic leanings. Reports indicate that Asif Nazrul, as legal adviser, has been given authority similar to that of a Speaker of Parliament.

Connecting these events provides insight into the country’s current political trajectory. The consequences of such actions will inevitably affect everyone, including those who may currently sit outside of this dynamic. Even the Jatiya Party, which supported this so-called revolution on July 16, may face repercussions, as may others in the wider political landscape.

The author is a blogger and IT expert from Sweden, known for his insightful analysis of the political landscape in Bangladesh. The views expressed in the piece above are personal and solely the author’s. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Firstpost.