NYT plagiarism consultant admits Harris scandal ‘more serious’ than he thought

New York Times plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey released his “comprehensive analysis” of the allegations against Vice President Kamala Harris, finding them “more serious” than first thought.

“At the time, I was not aware of a full dossier with additional allegations, leading some to accuse the New York Times of withholding this information from me. However, the article clearly stated that it was my ‘initial reaction’ to these allegations, is not a complete analysis,” Bailey wrote in Plagiarism Today on Wednesday. “Today I reviewed the full dossier prepared by Dr. Stefan Weber, whom I have covered before. I also peer-reviewed one of his papers in 2018.”

“With this new information, while I believe the case is more serious than I discussed in the New York Times, the general points remain. While there are problems with this work, the pattern points to sloppy writing habits , not to a malicious intent to defraud,” he added.

Plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey revealed that he had only reviewed the examples given to him by the New York Times at the time. (Getty Images)

KAMALA HARRIS ACCUSED OF PLAGIARISING 2009 BOOK ON BEING ‘CRIMINAL SMART’

“Is it problematic? Yes. But it’s also not the wholesale fraud that many have claimed it is. It’s somewhere between what both sides want it to be,” he said.

While Bailey continued to argue that the examples resembled sloppy work or carelessness rather than Harris’ malice, he admitted that some, specifically two paragraphs copied directly from Wikipedia, were clear examples of plagiarism.

“To be clear, this is plagiarism. This is in addition to the fact that Wikipedia is not normally considered a reliable source, and according to Weber, there was an error in the information,” Bailey wrote.

He concluded: “Ultimately, I recognize that this view will make absolutely no one happy. I do not believe that the book is a product of wholesale malicious plagiarism, nor do I believe that it is free from problems. No matter your side, that will. be an unsatisfactory answer.”

In a New York Times article dissecting the claims, Bailey claimed the examples were “a mistake and not an intent to deceive.” He accused conservative activist Chris Rufo, who reported the story, of taking minor offenses and trying to “make a big deal out of it.”

Harris has been accused of plagiarizing more than two dozen passages from her 2009 book. (AP/Jacquelyn Martin)

However, he later revealed to X that he had only reviewed the five examples provided to him by the New York Times and had not looked at the full analysis.

“For those coming here from the NY Times article. I want to be clear that I have NOT done a full analysis of the book. My quotes were based on information provided to me by reporters and were only talking about those passages” , he wrote. .

CLICK HERE FOR MORE MEDIA AND CULTURE COVERAGE

Rufo first reported on Monday that so-called “plagiarism hunter,” Austrian professor Stefan Weber, found 27 times that Harris and her co-author allegedly committed some form of plagiarism, writing, “24 excerpts are plagiarism other authors, (i) 3. the fragments are self-plagiarism from a work written with a co-author”.

Conservative activist Christopher Rufo reported the allegations on Monday. ((Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images), Right: (Photo by Thomas Simonetti for The Washington Post via Getty Images))

“In all, there is certainly a breach of standards here. Harris and his co-author duplicated long passages almost verbatim without proper citations and without quotation marks, which is the textbook definition of plagiarism,” Rufo wrote.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP